《发现的乐趣》是一部由Christopher Sykes执导，Richard Feynman主演的一部纪录片类型的电影，特精心从网络上整理的一些观众的影评，希望对大家能有帮助。

　　《发现的乐趣》影评(一)：带着好奇心去探索这个世界

看本文之前 先看看这篇文章

本质

发现的乐趣--理查德·费曼

看了这个视频之后，觉得理查德·费曼应该是一个充满好奇心的人

日常生活中，很多看似平常的事物背后，实际上是有很多看不见的东西在里面。

这个视频适合充满好奇心的人观看

希望自己的孩子未来成为超级人才的父母也值得一看

视频中，理查德·费曼 提到他的父亲在给他讲知识的时候，一般时通过讲故事的方式进行讲解的，这一点非常棒，相对于枯燥的知识，人类更喜欢通过故事来学习知识。

简而言之，向 理查德·费曼 学习。

在目前的社会，普通人致富主要有以下途径：

1 用自己的时间和精力换钱，即打工获取工资；

2 让资产生钱，例如钱生钱，收租金等，对于大部分来说，是通过钱生钱，来实现财富增长。

在目前的社会，大部分会选择通过股票，基金，证券来让财富增值，假如你准备通过股票，基金来让自己的财富增长，下面这篇文章是必看的。

超级福利：华泰证券免费开户（全网最低费率万1.3）

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/hoOBTDBmE666-NcMDOzdoQ

　　《发现的乐趣》影评(二)：只是一点点摘抄短评放不开了

　　我本来没打算写影评，但想写的东西稍微有点多，所以……

　　“My interest in science is to simply find out about the world and the more I find out the better it is, like, to find out. ”

　　“you see, one thing is, I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it’s much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. I have approximate answers and possible beliefs and different degrees of certainty about different things, but I‘m not absolutely sure of anything and there are many things I don't know anything about, such as whether it means anything to ask why we're here, and what the question might mean. I might think about it a little bit and if I can't figure it out, then I go on something else, but I don't have to know an answer, I don't feel frighted by not knowing things, by being lost in a mysterious universe without having any purposes which is the way it really is so far as I can tell. It doesn't frighten me."

　　大概十六岁的时候因为偶然的原因了解到了费曼，当时读了很多他的传记以及其他物理学家和数学家的科普书。虽然我最终未能从事物理学或数学方面的工作，我依然记得那份不可磨灭的感动，探索世界的热情，好奇心，以及勇于尝试的心态。

　　最近因为转方向的原因稍微有些迷茫，面对着概念的怪物有些不知所措。但我想，在我的生命中依然有很多不得不做，必须要做的事情，那些事情是我前进的动力，比方说还是想从事艺术或设计方面的工作，还是想学学数学（如果不懂微积分我的人生是不完整的！）和编程（虽然我稍微会那么一点点），文学创作就更是了。

　　稍微放松一些，专注于做事而不是强调某种结果，或许是更重要的。我其实觉得费曼强调的依靠兴趣做事不如换成用非功利的心态做事这种说法更好，有太多的事情强调结果而忽视了探索事物本身的乐趣，人应该保持一种宽容的探索之心。

　　关于装饰的问题，人文学科其实强调圈子，组织特别多，可能是因为没有统一的标准，所以很容易变得浮夸。我想，如果一个人暂时没办法找到能和他交流的人，保持沉默是最好的。有时候朋友并不可靠，特别是在某种名义下的组织和团体之中，你会为了这些人而降低自己建立友谊的标准，这对人的损害很大。所以，保持沉默，直到真正值得你开口的人出现为止。当然，也可能孤独地面对某个想法终生，即使如此，也要反对无意义的交流和谈话。

　　来面对那些未知吧，暂停思考进入到真正重要的事物之中。

　　《发现的乐趣》影评(三)：漂浮的勇氣

一直漂浮在雲端的哲學家問，人为什么活著。科學家說，不知道，但是我樂在發現。藝術家說，我樂在創作。工程師說，我樂在製作。豬說，我樂在吃呀。吃貨說，我們才不是豬。

筆記。

I have a limited intelligence and I use it in a particular direction. 智能有限用在一個特定方向上

Everything we’d read would be translated as best we could into some reality and so I learned to do that-everything that I read I try to figure out what it really means, what it’s really saying by translating…. 與自身現實聯繫起來以獲得對抽象的理解

“you know in all the languages you want to know what the name of that bird is and when you’ve finished with all that,” he says, “you’ll know absolutely nothing whatever about the bird. You only know about humans in different places and what they call the bird. Now,” he says, “let’s look at the bird.” 撥開語言描述的表面探尋事物的本質 /這裡藏著一個很有趣的問題

They [must have] expected me to be wonderful to offer me a job like this and I wasn’t wonderful, and therefore I realized a new principle, which was that I’m not responsible for what other people think I am able to do; I don’t have to be good because they think I’m going to be good. 謝絕普林斯頓研究所的職務，不為他人的期望負責

But if you realize all the time what’s kind of wonderful-that is, if we expand our experience into wilder and wilder regions of experience-every once in a while we have these integrations when everything’s pulled together into a unification, in which it turns out to be simpler than it looked before. 科學發現在拓寬人類經驗領域的同時，探索到的自然本質的規律卻越來越整合為一

If you are interested in the ultimate character of the physical world, or the complete world, and at the present time our only way to understand that is through a mathematical type of reasoning, then I don’t think a person can fully appreciate, or in fact can appreciate much of, these particular aspects of the world, the great depth of character of the universality of the laws, the relationships of things, without an understanding of mathematics. I I don’t know any other way to do it, we don’t know any other way to describe it accurately… or to see the interrelationships without it. So I don’t think a person who hasn’t developed some mathematical sense is capable of fully appreciating this aspect of the world… 如果沒有數學類型的理性很難在事物之間建立起內在聯繫也就不可能認識到事物的本質 /這裡又是一個很有趣的思考點

To do high, real good physics work you do need absolutely solid lengths of time, so that when you’re putting ideas together which are vague and hard to remember, 必須要整塊大塊的時間

the main point is, you put the stuff together, it’s quite a tower and it’s easy [for it] to slip, it needs a lot of concentration-that is, solid time to think-and if you’ve got a job in administrating anything like that, then you don’t have the solid time. So I have invented another myth for myself-that I’m irresponsible. 整塊的時間來思考 /探索類工作都需要，因此手機靜音是必須

All those students are in the class: Now you ask me how should I best teach them？ Should I teach them from the point of view of the history of science, from the applications？My theory is that the best way to teach is to have no philosophy, [it] is to be chaotic and [to] confuse it in the sense that you use every possible way of doing it. 從科學歷史或者應用的視角教學嗎？我的理論是任其混亂任其困惑你要使用任何可能的方式去做 /費曼這樣最不負責任的才是最負責任的。想起來有些教授要求學生必須引用他自己的博論也是真夠無恥的

Because of the success of science, there is, I think, a kind of pseudoscience. Social science is an example of a science which is not a science; they don’t do [things] scientifically, they follow the forms-or you gather data, you do so-and-so and so forth but they don’t get any laws, they haven’t found out anything. They haven’t got anywhere yet-maybe someday they will, but it’s not very well developed, but what happens is on an even more mundane level. 社會科學並沒有按照科學的方式進行，他們收集數據，但是沒有得出定律。也許哪天會得到真正的結果，但現在並沒有。 /社會科學中也有真材實料，但是假借科學之名招搖撞騙的就太多了。費曼真的是太能說大實話了，而且他能很快抓住談話中的關鍵點，沒有廢話。

There are very remarkable mysteries about the fact that we’re able to do so many more things than apparently animals can do, and other questions like that, but those are mysteries I want to investigate without knowing the answer to them, and so altogether I can’t believe these special stories that have been made up about our relationship to the universe at large because they seem to be too simple, too connected, too local, too provincial. The earth, He came to the earth, one of the aspects of God came to the earth, mind you, and look at what’s out there. It isn’t in proportion. Anyway, it’s no use arguing, I can’t argue it, I’m just trying to tell you why the scientific views that I have do have some effect on my belief. And also another thing has to do with the question of how you find out if something’s true, and if all the different religions have all different theories about the thing, then you begin to wonder. Once you start doubting, just like you’re supposed to doubt, you ask me if the science is true. You say no, we don’t know what’s true, we’re trying to find out and everything is possibly wrong. 科學思維如何影響到自身的宗教信仰 /其實辨別學者和騙子的方法很簡單，學者都會承認自己是在探索中，一直會在探索中，沒什麼是確信無疑的，任何發現也都有可能是錯的，只有騙子會說他絕對正確。

Start out understanding religion by saying everything is possibly wrong. Let us see. As soon as you do that, you start sliding down an edge which is hard to recover from and so on. With the scientific view, or my father’s view, that we should look to see what’s true and what may be or may not be true, once you start doubting, which I think to me is a very fundamental part of my soul, to doubt and to ask, and when you doubt and ask it gets a little harder to believe. You see, one thing is, I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it’s much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. I have approximate answers and possible beliefs and different degrees of certainty about different things, but I’m not absolutely sure of anything and there are many things I don’t know anything about, such as whether it means anything to ask why we’re here, and what the question might mean. I might think about it a little bit and if I can’t figure it out, then I go on to something else, but I don’t have to know an answer, I don’t feel frightened by not knowing things, by being lost in a mysterious universe without having any purpose, which is the way it really is so far as I can tell. It doesn’t frighten me. 與質疑不確定性和未知共存 我覺得在生活在未知中比有一個可能是錯的答案要更有趣。 我有一些趨近的答案和可能的信仰，以及對不同事物有著不同程度的確定，但是我不會對任何事情有著絕對的確定，還有很多事情我根本一無所知，比如追問我們為什麼存在於此是否意味著什麼，以及這個問題可能的含意，我可能會思考一下，然後如果我搞不清它我就會去做其他事情，我不必知道一個答案，我不會對未知感到驚恐，不會因爲在神祕的宇宙中沒有任何目的而感到迷失。 /那些不能活在不確定中的人都去尋求宗教的安慰了，或者，臣服於某個“絕對正確”的“領袖”。

必須說，勇氣真是個好東西

訪談紀錄 tranｓｃｒｉｐｔ of the interview in PDF